tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post5199065924088317654..comments2023-10-24T17:46:21.801+08:00Comments on William's Blog: Debunking Masaru Emoto- Messages from Waterwilliamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08185321475737096095noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-60287035498010772162019-03-21T04:43:35.927+08:002019-03-21T04:43:35.927+08:00I think the so-called scientists who 'debunked...I think the so-called scientists who 'debunked' emoto's finding are those at the same level with all those pharma-scientists who claimed to have found medicines to cure things but actually are the hands of big pharma companies. Sometimes a good simple finding hurts the ego of anyone who thinks they know better although they don't.<br />Emoto may not be so transparent or wholy scientific in his method, but I believe his finding still bears some beneficial truth in it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-44820111850002575862019-03-19T12:48:56.670+08:002019-03-19T12:48:56.670+08:00WEll to all the NAYSAYERS AND DEBUNKERS , to PROVE...WEll to all the NAYSAYERS AND DEBUNKERS , to PROVE the theory all you have to do is repeat it.. IT is NOT rocket science and not high level machinery.. All you need is water and microscopes.. <br />So why do you NOT repeat the experiments ?? instead of complaining ?? <br />I believe Mr. Emoto has proven a valid point..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-89257126396638874532018-12-02T13:49:45.541+08:002018-12-02T13:49:45.541+08:00I agree. We are made of water. Our brain synapses ...I agree. We are made of water. Our brain synapses are electrical impulses. Electrcity and ionized water do what together?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16579794716646976344noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-8208851643193246462017-09-21T19:15:28.389+08:002017-09-21T19:15:28.389+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Catherine Merrillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07194212477956777451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-76803049367876617962016-07-22T17:54:39.894+08:002016-07-22T17:54:39.894+08:00Sorry, this was the first part of my comment, miss...Sorry, this was the first part of my comment, missing from my previous post :<br /><br /><br />Wow, the comments are quite shocking... <br />When given different possible explanations for a phenomenon, the explanation that we tend to believe in is the one that has the highest probability given our knowledge about how things work. If someone comes to me saying that he has met aliens, to me the highest chance is that this person has mental illness. Because we have never seen proof of aliens on earth, but we have seen many people with mental illness who talk about seeing aliens (and we have seen a lot of liers too). And it is good that it works like that, otherwise everybody would believe in absolutely everything since everybody pretends to have evidence of every possible phenomena (aliens, seeing the future, telepathy, past lives, synchronicity, science in the Coran etc..). And I am sure that most people who believe in Emoto's work do not believe in all those things at once, when there are plenty more of "evidences" of those things around us too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-35180614713685446662016-07-22T17:53:22.168+08:002016-07-22T17:53:22.168+08:00Then the point of science is to make observations ...<br />Then the point of science is to make observations and bring more evidence that will increase the probability that one hypothesis is more valid than others. But some things are so incredible given our knowledge about the world, that even with a high number of evidence the result is still doubtful. Prooving an incredible theory requires an incredible quality of evidence, and that is absolutely normal. And that does not mean that the idea will never be accepted scientifically, because scientists are not open minded enough or something like that. Pseudo scientists often use analogies to quantum physics to support their claims. In quantum physics, we say that a particle can be at one position and another at the same time, and also that the two probabilities to find the particles at two positions can also interfere with each other like two actually different particles (see young's slits). This is quite incredible and was very much in contradiction with peoples vision of the world at the time, and could sound very unrealistic, very pseudo scientific or even paranormal. And yet it was quickly accepted by many scientists, simply because solid evidence was provided. So scientists ARE able to accept incredible things when given correct evidences.<br />What I find incredible is that most people talking about Emoto's work do not realize how far the implications are from the current knowledge we have about the work. I often hear it cited just as one other evidence that we have to be careful about what intentions we send to others because it can harm them. And then after 2 minutes people switch to another topic, as if this was just another thing. This tells a lot about how incredible their view of the world must be. If thoughts can really affect matter, if water can really retain information about emotions, for example, that is so incredible that anybody who believes that would want to make a lot of experiments to prove it. They would want to know how much time the memory can be retained in water, what is the vector of the emotions, electromagnetic waves ? What wavelength ? Then what about trying to put different types of shields ? Why don't a shitload of people try to replicate the experiment with the same rigor (double blind etc...), how about trying to see if some things can erase the memory of water, like boiling or freezing ? All those things could help us understand what are the physical phenomena behind that and support the theory a lot. That would be extremely interesting for anybody who believes in that. If I believed in that, I would seriously stop everything I am doing and start studying that for the rest of my life. But it seems that nobody cares. One or two experiments are enough for people to prove the thing, and then nobody cares. This I find incredible. You cannot just simply show a picture of a flying saucer and expect all the world to believe in aliens like you do, as if it is a thing as common as encountering a squirrel in the forrest. Of course nobody will believe you. Of course the most probable thing they will believe is that your flying saucer is due to an error in the developpement of the film or simply that you made it up. Because that is the most probable thing. And you cannot expect all the non believers to do the experiments to disprove your claim. There are so many paranormal hypotheses around the world, people don't have time to make all the experiments to prove that to people who would not believe it anyway because they have no understanding of a how proving a scientific hypothesis works. You cannot just make a claim based on weak evidence, and then expect the whole world to spend the time doing the correct experiments for you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-28248491313441424122016-05-04T08:32:01.591+08:002016-05-04T08:32:01.591+08:00Whether Masuru Emoto has been to an accredited uni...Whether Masuru Emoto has been to an accredited university or not does not affect the validity of his work. Further, claims that he is not "a proper scientist" sound to me like intellectual snobbery. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Alan O'Neillnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-77476971970171837492016-04-24T11:00:42.891+08:002016-04-24T11:00:42.891+08:00Before any living being engages with another livin...Before any living being engages with another living being a dichotomy as a neural switch is present to either engage with agenda of "love" or "not love". Mr. Emoto's engaged the many many people with "love" and he proceeded with scientific protocol serving to propagate "love" to those he engaged. Mr. William here has attempted to engage others with gesture of "not love". He further presents an argument that serves to promote "not love" to those that he engages. I choose who, what and how to be engaged and I try always to choose "love" and I will explore further Mr. Emoto's research to better propagate "love" to those I engage in possibly a more scientific and reproducible manner. After all, I live a life of "love". Who the heck wishes a life of "no love" upon himself. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-21584237514480760722016-04-04T14:03:38.223+08:002016-04-04T14:03:38.223+08:00Well sir after reading your views on his experimen...Well sir after reading your views on his experiments I would rather believe him than you. He may not have conducted his experiments as you described, and this may have been intentional. The bottom line is that these experiments have been done by many qualified scientist and found to have merit as for your efforts you have not provided any clear evidence that these are wrong as by your description of crystals at the head of this page you have place the wrong words in your statement of effect of music on the crystals e.g. you stated heavy metal music when the music was classical so I give you minus 1 for you attempts.<br />There is one other way to look at this If he is wrong is there a better way to live that you know off.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-67597589713934226432016-03-02T04:10:47.335+08:002016-03-02T04:10:47.335+08:00some of the great scientists that have all the com...some of the great scientists that have all the comments should do some scientific examination and not jus talk about it. science has proven that we affect plants animals and many other things by verbage, tone inflections and again I ask why not wateru. I would like to see anonomouses credentials. If one out of a 1000 was affected the hypothesis was corret even if the procedure is flawed. <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04415789151246356133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-52861440169905158932016-02-20T09:36:16.289+08:002016-02-20T09:36:16.289+08:00Water isn't a cell it's an elementWater isn't a cell it's an elementAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-40100473466760436202016-01-27T09:43:21.646+08:002016-01-27T09:43:21.646+08:00HI
I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT SCRIPTURE SAYS IT, ...HI<br /><br />I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT SCRIPTURE SAYS IT, CELLS HAVE MEMORY, PLANTS REACT TO WORDS SO WHY NOT WATER? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04415789151246356133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-42275607050440371992016-01-03T08:28:28.500+08:002016-01-03T08:28:28.500+08:00I stopped reading the posts.. Nothing I've ...I stopped reading the posts.. Nothing I've seen would justify the blatant nonsense I see against the phenomena. It Still stands ! Why does water react as it does and what effect do we have on each other? Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02907945949354216668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-35202260941485110982015-05-19T09:21:04.300+08:002015-05-19T09:21:04.300+08:00If you are going to go out of your way to debunk s...If you are going to go out of your way to debunk someone else's claims, then run your own experiment to prove it wrong. Or just go do something better with your time then destroy the beautiful work of a well intentioned man. Quantum Physicists are now proving that none of this may even be real. Our own existence, or what we believe it to be, cannot be proved by the top minds in our world. Get over your self. Science is proving way more esoteric things than this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-50853747120862253312015-05-14T06:37:26.360+08:002015-05-14T06:37:26.360+08:00SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY...WHAT HELL ARE THEY DOING TO...SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY...WHAT HELL ARE THEY DOING TO HUMANITY...? LET US NOT DEPEND ON WHAT THEY CALL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY.....THEY THEMSELVES HAVE THEIR INDIVIDUAL MOTIVE FILLED WITH PERSONAL INTRIGUES...TAKE A LOOK BACK IN HISTORY BETWEEN PASTEUR VS. BECHAMP AND THOMAS EDISON VS. TESLA!!!! SCIENTIFIC......LET US NOT DEPEND ON WHAT THEY CALL SCIENTIFIC..... IT IS JUST A BUNCH OF IGNORANCE CLAIMING FOR TRUTH.<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-62371938634932861952015-04-08T21:43:23.863+08:002015-04-08T21:43:23.863+08:00...and i am accredited by PSP and THC!!
Result of......and i am accredited by PSP and THC!!<br /><br />Result of another quick google search ("iao wauc college accreditation"):<br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unrecognized_higher_education_accreditation_organizations" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unrecognized_higher_education_accreditation_organizations</a>Stefannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-605491536605524532015-04-08T09:48:45.739+08:002015-04-08T09:48:45.739+08:00Quick Google search about the university which you...Quick Google search about the university which you said wasn't accredited. On the first page of the website: Accredited By IAO, WAUC, United States of America<br />Membership With UNESCO & UNICEF Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-81723667163852050612015-04-08T09:42:59.889+08:002015-04-08T09:42:59.889+08:00Quick Google search, the University's web page...Quick Google search, the University's web page: Accredited By IAO, WAUC, United States of America<br />Membership With UNESCO & UNICEF <br />And there you have it, it is accredited. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-90243803578534456582015-02-14T03:58:05.630+08:002015-02-14T03:58:05.630+08:00The problem with the rice experiment is the same a...The problem with the rice experiment is the same as the problem with the water experiment. Because Emoto does not place strict controls on his experiments, he could be contaminating them. One rice container may have not been exposed to bacteria, two may have been. For the naysayers of this "debunking", true debunking is recreating the experiment with strict controls and as a double-blind study, but having said that, how guillable are you? The obvious errors and omissions from Emoto support a written, not tested, debunking.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02231729515644005044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-75537502948925713892014-11-18T16:06:48.869+08:002014-11-18T16:06:48.869+08:00The reason for controlled, repeatable experiments ...The reason for controlled, repeatable experiments is so they can be peer reviewed and VERIFIED - or DISPROVED. People asking for PROOF that his experiments failed, don't seem to understand that because he did not use any scientific methods, this is NOT POSSIBLE. Therein lies the problem.TLK3https://www.blogger.com/profile/02310984474498247494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-59375271655746450732014-11-03T02:15:30.064+08:002014-11-03T02:15:30.064+08:00did you attempt to re create his experiment? did y...did you attempt to re create his experiment? did you remove all instances conceivable by you, to properly improve on his work?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-23543817066048757232014-09-05T05:26:51.549+08:002014-09-05T05:26:51.549+08:00Until a scientist comes in and says "Yah, i a...Until a scientist comes in and says "Yah, i approve this..." Then they all say its gospel truth. The bottom line is that most claiming to even speak in the name of science are playing the "Be on the winning team" game. I don't know about you but im shaking in my shoes because theres no peer review report. hey heres a great concept-- See if it works! Stop waiting for all these fools to tell you it is or it isn't because even if they did... Ummm. What exactly is their perogative in telling you? I get it. Wait another 100 years so your kids may find out if its true or not. GREAT PLAN.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-38837335415810044472014-08-03T04:03:24.082+08:002014-08-03T04:03:24.082+08:00I agree, there was little of the scientific method...I agree, there was little of the scientific method at play here. I also agree that to study under more controlled conditions could prove very interesting. Check this out, they are trying to rais the funds right now to do just that! http://is-masaru-emoto-for-real.com/emoto-research-study/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-23495521088505432172014-06-07T04:58:52.187+08:002014-06-07T04:58:52.187+08:00Thanks for sharing your opinions on this blog, Wil...Thanks for sharing your opinions on this blog, William. According to your reasoning, Leonardo da Vinci is also a pseudoscientist. Right? And we cannot trust any of his research because he was much too artistic. Right? And also because he didn't have any of the proper modern scientific controls. Right? And neither did most scientists in the past so they should be all discredited. Right?EiSeNheiMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14753252718121013444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648451399668691417.post-87722477497585008842014-05-07T00:41:45.402+08:002014-05-07T00:41:45.402+08:001. "in his experiments he has emphasised that...1. "in his experiments he has emphasised that good words have to be spoken with faith . saying good words without conviction brings u to no where." Perfect loophole. Now, if someone else does the experiment and it doesn't produce his results, he can simply dismiss that by saying they didn't speak the words with enough "faith".<br /><br />2. "Science makes no claim to study metaphysical questions about belief and spirituality; this is one of the limitations of the scientific method." Surely that's a strength, not a limitation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com